Jump to content

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Image workshop/Archive/Dec 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DyceBot (talk | contribs) at 08:02, 1 December 2008 (Archiving 2 stale sections and 2 resolved sections.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Stale

Romeo and Juliet

Article(s): Romeo and Juliet

Request: At the Romeo and Juliet featured article candidature I commented that many of the images needed nice crops, cleaning. I have listed above the ones I thought were most obvious that someone could help with but feel free to look at the article if you think you can help with others. My 'comments' are vague because I am not good at this... but all of the images I paste I think could be cleaned up somewhat to make this a better FAC.

It may be a good idea to upload as different, restored images and then comment on the FAC or change them yourselves rather than overwriting these images. gren グレン 12:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I uploaded a new version of the portrait of John Gielgud. The author requested that his work integrity should not be touched. I hope that the black border was not part of the work. What do you think? --pabouk (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Charlotte Cushman Susan Cushman also done.   ■ MMXXtalk  16:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I straightened out Image:Arthur Brooke Tragicall His.jpg somewhat, feel free to revert if you want the old version back. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 20:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also retouched the second image, but didn't replace the original this time. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 22:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is image straight?

Article(s): Quadripoint

Request: I tried to straighten the image from its right-tilted original but I am not convinced that it is entirely straight yet. But it may just be the curve of my monitor distracing me. Can someone with better image software chek it? Rmhermen (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: It was off a tad. But it depends what you wanted to look straight, for instance I used the cross as my vert and horiz measures. Out of curiosity what software did you use? If you feel my edit detracts from the image please revert it! §hep¡Talk to me! 18:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thumbnail isn't updating... Seen this on a few other images but I don't know the cause. :( -----J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Iz becuz zhe wiki needs to get sum new image rendering software. (That was fun) §hep¡Talk to me! 22:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very familiar with these type of conflicts. Due to the angle of the shot, it may never be fixed completely with a "straighting" software.

Resolved