Template talk:Db-meta/Archive Db-empty

I created this template because I got sick and tired of typing it out manually all of the time. Timesaver, it is.--Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 13:16, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this template to {{deletebecause/empty}} in order to help clean up the CSD category listing. {{db:a1}} redirects here. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 08:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TfD

Template:Tfd-keep Dan100 (Talk) 11:44, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

rename

I moved this tempalte to {{Db-empty}} so that all the speedy deletion templates would have consistant names, and would all group together in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. DES ^(talk) 22:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

{{dbe}} redirects here. --malathion ^talk 08:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So do {{empty}}, {{Db:a1}}, and {{deletebecause/empty}}. DES ^(talk) 16:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion

This template is currently implemented by Transclusion. Before changing this, please look at Template talk:Db-reason#Transclusion, where the issue of using tranclusion in the speedy deletion templates is discussed. DES ^(talk) 17:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Context" or "content"?

I believe there's a minor vocabulary error here. "Little or no content" makes more sense than "little or no context". - Rlw (Talk) 18:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It has always been context, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A1. --cesarb 20:29, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The point is, if there is no conTEXT, no one else can determine hopw to expand article or validate the information in it. Little conTENT, as long as there is some content, and some context, has potential for expansion. Thus it is articles lacking in context that are speedy candidates. DES ^(talk) 21:11, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]