Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NickBush24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GregNorc (talk | contribs) at 19:22, 12 October 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vote here (19/0/0) ending 03:54 October 19, 2005 (UTC)

NickBush24 (talk · contribs) – NickBush24 came to Wikipedia as one of the most prolific people from GameFAQ's. Since then, he has left GameFAQ's for Wikipedia. He has enough edits where I don't think Editcountitus will be a problem, and he got his welcome on July 1st. The first time I saw him was when he reverted vandalism to my user page circa July 10th. The troll then made the name NickBush24isgay and a few other names. He practices RC Patrol and I've seen him helping people out. His user page has suffered about 50 times due to his RC Patrolling and trollslaying. He deserves the tools I believe. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: OMG I ACCEPT LOLE >_> NickBush24 04:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. I support him fully. -GregNorc (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Definitely. Redwolf24 (talk)
  3. I definitely would support this decision. foxdude333 (talk)
  4. I believe NickBush24 has the potential to become an excellent administrator! Thatdog 08:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Extreme Hula Hoop Support! Acetic'Acid 10:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Heh. If your userpage gets vandalised 50 times, you're doing something right. David Gerard 11:25, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support--Exir KamalabadiEsperanza 11:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support: the response to the antics of User:NickBush24isgay seals it for me. Graham/pianoman87 talk 11:55, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Seems good to me. Dlyons493 Talk 13:18, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. My support too. --MissingLinks 14:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support I beleieve NickBush24 would make a good admin. Alf melmac 15:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. →Journalist >>talk<< 15:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support, a bold fighter of vandals. Christopher Parham (talk) 15:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Merovingian (t) (c) 15:45, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. FireFox 16:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support A good RC patroler --JAranda | yeah 17:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support - most certainly....en passant! 17:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support CambridgeBayWeather 17:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Yes, definitely. A great RC patroller. Banes 17:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support He isn't already? Private Butcher 19:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. Basically blocking vandals, keeping an eye on the speedy deletion candidates, and other stuff. Those are the two things I intend to do at the start of my adminship, with more chores coming in the future.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I'd have to say starting the articles for each of the six divisions in Major League Baseball. There's others I'm happy about but can't think of at the moment.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Nope, not really. Right now... I'm not quite sure how to deal with it, but I should find a way sometime in the very near future. Currently I just listen to music to help take my mind off it >_>