Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Doable Challenge-Response System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) at 02:03, 18 November 2008 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 02:03, 18 November 2008 by Juliancolton (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Human Doable Challenge-Response System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable research project. Only citation is someone's lecture slides. Search for "Human Doable Challenge-Response System" on Google or Google Scholar reveal no results. ZimZalaBim talk 19:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless there are references to the same system under a different name, this is not a notable security proposal. There might be a place for this in the challenge-response authentication family of articles. - Eldereft (cont.) 19:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the content into the "Examples" section of Challenge-response authentication. LinguistAtLarge 19:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- merge per User:LinguistAtLarge --Philcha (talk) 13:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete not even sure "doable" is a real word.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, treelo radda 00:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's an essay. It's a very pretty essay, but it is still an essay. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.