User talk:Runteldat

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Rollosmokes (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wpixcw11-1.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpixcw11-1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newark vs. New York

You may very well be right. HOWEVER--you give no source for your edits. Whereas, my edit was SOURCED. If you find a better, WP:VER source that says Newark, go right ahead and add it. However, I'm wondering what POSSIBLE source could be more authoratative than the stations' OWN WEBSITE. If you find one, though, go right ahead. Gladys J Cortez 07:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please add that source to the article--when all the branding says "New York" there's good reason to verify in the article that there is an official source that says "Newark". Thanks...Gladys J Cortez 13:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

Several of your previous edits have been reverted as this and other editors are concerned that you may be a sockpuppet for blocked editor Rollosmokes and also your edits were not necessary. It would be helpful for you to address the sockpuppetry concerns before continuing to edit. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 15, 2008 @ 10:13

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wpix-newlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpix-newlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry, as per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Runteldat. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Runteldat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a new user who has been unfairly accused as a sockpuppet. Any editing of articles similar to those edited by the banned user in question has been purely conincidental. I have not engaged in any edit wars with any users, and have followed all rules in regards to editing.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am a new user who has been unfairly accused as a sockpuppet. Any editing of articles similar to those edited by the banned user in question has been purely conincidental.  I have not engaged in any edit wars with any users, and have followed all rules in regards to editing. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am a new user who has been unfairly accused as a sockpuppet. Any editing of articles similar to those edited by the banned user in question has been purely conincidental.  I have not engaged in any edit wars with any users, and have followed all rules in regards to editing. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am a new user who has been unfairly accused as a sockpuppet. Any editing of articles similar to those edited by the banned user in question has been purely conincidental.  I have not engaged in any edit wars with any users, and have followed all rules in regards to editing. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

{{unblock|your reason here}} below.