Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/UnrealSpiritX
Template:Checkuser requests to be listed
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 16:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC) |
- UnrealSpiritX (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Apawk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkA (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkB (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkC (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkD (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkE (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ApawkX (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence:
Initial report by HairyPerry (deleted and refiled by Barneca to fix some formatting issues)
[1][2] Has admitted to being these two users just want to make sure. Did make threats to create more and has followed through with that threat. HairyPerry 15:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Additional comments by Barneca
This checkuser is needed more to clean out the sock drawer and block the underlying IP’s (if possible), rather than verify socking, because UnrealSpiritX admits being Apawk here: [3] and Apawk admits being UnrealSpiritX here [4].
As ApawkA, the user refers here [5] to having 12 computers and 200 accounts. Wording it that way makes me think/hope “computer lab” rather than “dynamic IP”. A CU would help find any other accounts, and hopefully find a very narrow IP range for this hypothetical computer lab whos IPs we could rangeblock. --barneca (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)