Jump to content

Talk:Rectangular function

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.30.95.216 (talk) at 12:35, 7 November 2008 (I made a note about a change that I attempted in the main article, so that any not-so-lucky edit is reverted quickly by the specialist.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A perfect example of a rectangular function that I think should be added is:

We already have a much simpler perfect example. Less is more. --Bob K 00:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. — Omegatron 00:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am I going mad, or is the definition of this simple function just completely wrong? Shouldn't it be

R(x) = 0, if x < -1/2
R(x) = 1, if -1/2 <= x <= 1/2
R(x) = 0, if x > 1/2

????— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.107.11 (talk)

Please sign your entries with "~~~~"
Is it the values at x = ± ½ that you are concerned about? --Bob K 04:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am used to seeing this definition in the literature:
Though I have also seen the current definition (). I just added in a short blurb about the various definitions. --Rabbanis 18:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the "As long as the function is motivated by the time-domain experience of it..." clause. I thought it contains insight but I could be mistaken. 77.30.95.216 (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]