Talk:Indian python

idea for improvement

Hi! Unfortunately this page includes many inconsistencies. Probably there is some helpful information at the German Wikipedia for upgrading this page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigerpython Good luck! 84.74.165.175 (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amphibians and Reptiles Unassessed High‑importance

	Indian python is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian python article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

We should try and help save any endangered animal no matter how evil people think that animal may be. people may not have realized it yet if one animal falls every animal will fall.

67.161.82.103 01:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)how much bones do they have in their body?67.161.82.103 01:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse L.,

Size

"The longest recorded specimen measured 5.85 m (19 ft 2 in) (Cooch-Behar, West Bengal)." If this is a maximum for the nominate (P. m. molurus), it should be made clear. It's too low for the maximum of this species, as subspecies bivittatus (which, for some reason, has its own article) grows much larger than this. --Anshelm '77 16:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but when I recently fixed up this article, I didn't have much in the way of specific information on pythonids with which to do any fact checking. I have lots of information on viperids, as well as general taxonomic and geographical data, but not much else (good books cost lots of money). I suspect that you are right about this value in that it probably applies to P. m. molurus; earlier version of these articles were written as though the contributers were unaware that the P. m. molurus and P. m. bivittatus are related. If nobody else does, I suspect that I will eventually correct all this information myself, although that may take a while. Hey, you wanna help out?! Ha, just joking. Cheers, --Jwinius 20:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]