Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Filiocht

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Michael Snow (talk | contribs) at 03:42, 7 October 2005 (copied statement from candidate page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I've been around since about July 2003, one way or the other, and became an admin around the end of that year. Anyone with an interest in the more obscure corners of 20th century literature may have seen some of my edits.

I have no position on the performance of the existing ArbCom, and nothing I say should be taken as implicit criticism. I run on a simple platform. I would aim to follow the following basic principles:

  • Equality of respect: the same standards of behaviour should be extended to and expected of all users. Being an admins gives me no rights that are not also extended to non-admins, I deserve no more leeway than someone who has been here for 3 months. Of course, I exclude the real newcomers, who should never be bitten.
  • Wikilove: enough said.
  • Assume good faith: ditto.
  • Talking is better than blocking, discussing is better than voting. In the last resort, blocking/banning is better than letting one person drain the time, energy and goodwill of the many.
  • We're here to build an encyclopaedia, not a playground.

Beyond these, I have no preconceptions and would expect to grow into the role according to the needs of Wikipedia. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions and comments