Jump to content

Talk:Shmoo plot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FairuseBot (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 2 November 2008 (Image Image:Twoshmoos.jpg in this article is not compliant with the non-free content rules). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Copyright?

Is "Shmoo Plot" copyrighted by Teradyne or trademarked? I don't believe that a two word phrase can be copyrighted, only trademarked. --66.88.133.2 16:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the application of copyright vs. trademark; I don't know if Teradyne really has a trademark on the name. They might however have a copyright on the design of graph paper for use in making a Shmoo plot.--Theodore Kloba 15:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the uspto.gov web site, and there is no mention of a copyright or trademark on shmoo, other than from Al Capp's estate. But you don't need a registered copyright to have a copyright. So the statement could be correct. 72.74.96.24 21:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Terms cannot be copyrighted or patented, only trademarked, so the statement is at least inaccurate if not downright false. DanielPenfield 21:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As substantial doubt has been cast on the veracity of this statement, now supporting evidence was offered, and I could find no such evidence on the Teradyne Web site, I have removed the statement. If you feel that it should be added back:

  • Please place it in a more appropriate location (it has really nothing to do with etymology).
  • Please add a reference or at least note any supporting evidence on this discussion page.

--213.71.6.220 (talk) 13:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The GIF file example in the link is not very inspiring. We could do with some clearer examples of Shmoo plots. DFH 08:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:Twoshmoos.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]