Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wknight94 (talk | contribs) at 15:34, 1 November 2008 (Archive Brfc97, ToadGed, AlexLevyOne, Artemis (not the Fowl kind)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/IP/A

Requests for IP check

This page lists requests to identify and block the IP addresses behind attack and vandal accounts that were previously listed at Requests for checkuser/IP check. After the account has been reported as blocked or declined by the checkusers, the report is moved here for seven days (most recent sections at the bottom), after which it is deleted. Because there is no attempt to establish a relationship with a puppetmaster account, no separate archive is kept, other than the page history.

Clerks: when clearing this page, please make note of the names of the sections you are deleting in the edit summary.


Brfc97

Two new Brfc97 socks; vandalised Blackburn Rovers F.C., East Lancashire derby and User:Bill. —Snigbrook 18:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Stale Brfc97 (talk · contribs)  Confirmed Cnivans (talk · contribs) = Alanson (talk · contribs) = Electbo (talk · contribs) = Indrechtach (talk · contribs) = Jeetze (talk · contribs) = Mavilos (talk · contribs) = Megachurch (talk · contribs) = 90.205.45.226 (talk · contribs) = 90.205.45.45 (talk · contribs). IPs one month block, names indef'd. I blocked the ones not blocked already, leaving to clerks on who to tag as the master. RlevseTalk 14:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ToadGed

All three are usernames designed to attack Ged UK (talk · contribs). Somehow the person creating these accounts is evading the autoblock--if it's possible to nuke the underlying IP, it would be much appreciated. Blueboy96 22:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another account, GedGland (talk · contribs) has vandalised an article previously vandalised by BonerGed (talk · contribs). It looks like the same vandal as the IPs in User:Ged UK/Vandalwatch. —Snigbrook 16:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all 4 are the same user, as well as BufoMarinusHughes (talk · contribs). Dynamic range too big to block RlevseTalk 02:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AlexLevyOne

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(3rd). This is a serial sockpuppeteer, all of the above-named accounts of whom have been indef blocked except for WALL STREET. Seeking whether there is a stable underlying IP, so that creation of additional accounts might be blocked, at least for a while. (It would be nice if someone would actually block WALL STREET as well.) Deor (talk) 23:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:WALL STREET now blocked. We can probably expect another account to be created by this user within a couple of days. JohnInDC (talk) 10:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all same user but too dynamic to block IP. Elsass3 is STALE.RlevseTalk 14:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Artemis (not the Fowl kind)

SUL'd an imp account. Trying to get the SUL removed; got it renamed first. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 23:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined need more evidence. RlevseTalk 14:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]