Talk:Green tree python

	Green tree python is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Unassessed

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

First paragraph out of place?

I get the feeling that the first paragraph is from some article comparing the Tree Python to some other species, someone who knows what the paragraph is trying to say could perhaps make it a more suitable introduction? 193.166.84.136 17:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another green tree snake?

There seems to be a rather different snake called 'green tree snake': [1] This one can also be known as the 'yellow-bellied black snake' when it's particularly dark. Do we have an article on it? Stevage 13:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no doubt at all that there are lots of different snakes in the world that people refer to as green tree snakes. That's one of many reasons why it's such a good idea to use scientific names for article titles while using common names for redirects and disambiguation pages. --Jwinius (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A more detailed image

It's not mine but it came up on FP and it is much sharper and full of detail than the existing 2 similar pictures and consequently I would maintain has much higher enc value. I added it to the article but it got reverted, so I am leaving it here for anyone with more knowledge of the subject to look at and compare to the existing images. Mfield (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree with Narayanese. Yes, this image does have a much higher resolution, but somehow I don't find it to be that attractive. At least it's available via the Wikimedia Commons link, along with quite a few others. Maybe we'll add it later once the article has become larger. --Jwinius (talk) 22:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transferring

This is the image that was at the top of the page. I'm going to be bold and switch it with the one just above, which does look better. And if the article becomes larger, there's no reason not to add this photo as well as necessary. zafiroblue05 | Talk 07:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've reverted to the previous image because it shows a specimen in a more characteristic position (see arguments is previous section). --Jwinius (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]