Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/October 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The thing is, while there are not 60 stubs of Norwegian politicians born in the 1740s or 1750s, this is meant to be categorized in the large Category:Norwegian politician, 18th century birth stubs. Categorizing here, and not in the vague Category:Norwegian politician stubs, would be good. Punkmorten (talk) 08:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy support per precedent. Waacstats (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy, and might as well throw in the remaining decades, too. Alai (talk) 01:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- SpeedyBlofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The Bald One White cat 15:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I'll upmerge this now. The Bald One White cat 11:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Template:Sfd bottom
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The Bald One White cat 21:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support with by nation templates. Waacstats (talk) 10:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- There are many missing articles from spanish wiki which I have and will be adding further so that seems like a logical idea. Upmerge the ones that don't qualify? The Bald One White cat 18:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposals:
- {{Mexico-writer-stub}}
- {{Belize-writer-stub}}
- {{ElSalvador-writer-stub}}
- {{CostaRica-writer-stub}}
- {{Guatemala-writer-stub}}
- {{Honduras-writer-stub}}
- {{Nicaragua-writer-stub}}
- {{Panama-writer-stub}}
Could somebody offer a stub count and which need upmerging, me has to go to beddy boys. Cheers The Bald One White cat 22:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Change to {{ElSalvador-writer-stub}} and add {{Guatemala-writer-stub}}. Probably best to upmerge all of them till we have an exact figure.Waacstats (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support, but one comment - Mexico is rarely if ever described as being in Central America, so hopefully it will reach threshold. Grutness...wha? 22:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah - I see it's already got its own cat... and I've just removed the vandalism from it :/ Grutness...wha? 22:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
- Template upmerged
Create as upmerged template for {{Asia-school-stub}} and {{Nepal-stub}}. Most of the 26 articles in Category:Schools in Nepal are stubs. -- Eastmain (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Create upmerged template. As long as it doesn't encourage the creation of non notable school articles The Bald One White cat 17:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yup - an upmerged template here makes a lot of sense. Grutness...wha? 01:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)