Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System of Imagination
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 21:32, 4 October 2008 (Signing comment by Alex Bieser - "→System of Imagination: Died too hard?"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 21:32, 4 October 2008 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by Alex Bieser - "→System of Imagination: Died too hard?")
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ffm 01:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- System of Imagination (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Pointless topic made up in school. – iridescent 19:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore - Don't you people have anything better to do than rant? I created it by myself and I received no contribution, questioning, or even a bit of rehabilitation to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Bieser (talk • contribs) 21:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:OR, WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOT.... -- Logical Premise Ergo? 19:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's not notable. There are plenty of other arguments for deletion, but that one is all that I need. Merenta (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At best it is poor original research but sadly, & per nom, it is probably little more than WP:MADEUP. Wikipedia can do without this sort of nonsense. nancy (talk) 19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Logical and Nancy: orignial research at best. Cliff smith talk 20:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, though there's something winsome about a theory of the afterdeath referenced to Wes Craven's Nightmare on Elm Street. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I had to look up the word winsome in wictionary. Delete. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 12:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.