Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problem Solver

Problem Solver

wp:crystalball. Sources say nothing about the song being a single, only about who wrote the song. crystalballing at its worst. PHARMBOY (TALK) 19:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE ~~Redirect Merge~~ ~~to Lindsay Lohan OR Lindsay Lohan discography.~~ until it can be decided where this song goes, as the article itself is non-notable and the information will be brought back in the near future anyway. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As i just added below, why merge a song that isn't officially a single? That is why I think you have to delete. We know it will exist, but not that it will be a single, or chart. PHARMBOY (TALK) 21:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - As a side note, I don't doubt you in thinking it will be back, it is just about a pure case of crystalball only. We see so many crystalball cases, I feel we have to hold the same standard for all of them. Additionally, if it comes back, it should be titled differently anyway, ie: Problem Solver (song). PHARMBOY (TALK) 21:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would be STRONGLY against redirecting a common phrase like this. The most common use of the phrase is NOT the song. PHARMBOY (TALK) 20:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*With respects, there are songs being written for a third studio album... and as I have found, the song Problem Solver does exist as a track on the new album. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know the song exists, but it isn't a released single no wp:rs that it will be. PHARMBOY (TALK) 21:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valid point, if anything redirect Problem Solver Song or something similar. Problem Solver is more notable for other reasons than being a single. --Banime (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Sorry. I see what he means. A redirect for "Problem Solver (song)" makes more sense... or heck, why not simply merge this to Lindsay Lohan discography? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Would you normally do a merge for a song that isn't confirmed as a single yet, though? PHARMBOY (TALK) 21:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Also "Thirth" album? Lurn tu spel rite plz. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Crystalball, wait til later for the article if ever. --Banime (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If she doesn't care to promote it, we shouldn't care about creating an article about a crystal song that isn't coming out anytime soon. Also very vague and badly written; what movie is she filming? Who cares about Akon's role in this song if it's only mentioned at the end? Nate • (chatter) 00:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: everything in this article is not true....must be deleted immediately...

CHECKORUP (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move this, CHECKORUP? An article being considered for deletion should not be moved. Wildhartlivie (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. I had thought about moving back, but it will be deleted shortly enough. Moving, except in exceptional circumstances, is never a good idea in AFD. PHARMBOY (TALK) 15:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, I did move and speedy delete the redirect to boot. Dumb to move and then still title improperly. PHARMBOY (TALK) 15:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]