Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fp code
plus: talk:fp code, fail, outcome, now and fail, now and fail statement, NOW AND FAIL statement, do statement and DO statement. (I think that is all.)
A formal logic system created by pyenos in September 2005. Total nonsense / original research. I tagged this for speedy but the author removed the tag. -- RHaworth 06:11, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
It is not important but does it have to be important? Pyenos 07:18, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Hey Pyenos. It is obvious that you have put a LOT of work into that article, however Wikipedia has a policiy on not listing original research (as it is an encyclopaedia, so it has to go with commonly accepted facts). However, if you are able to show real-world/practical applications of Fp code and its advantages/disadvantages to other programming languages, I would be happy to change my vote. It is, however, important that articles in Wikipedia are on notable things so that it does become a research source. I hope you don't get discouraged by all of this, as I'm sure you would be able to contribute to a lot of other articles out there.cheers, alf 11:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete all. OR. Dottore So 11:30, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: it's only original research because the author has yet to publish it elsewhere, but it is original. Also slapped wrist to RHaworth for tagging it nonsense: it is not patent nonsense. - mholland 12:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Definitely get rid of the associated cruft articles, though. - mholland 12:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as nonsense and OR. (Comment to mholland: all OR is OR "because the author has yet to publish it elsewhere", by definition.) And I have studied logic, but the article is incomprehensible to me. MCB 17:56, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as original research. --Carnildo 23:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
I purposely didn't use jargons and to me, although it is not important, it is consistent and complete. I could elaborate further, especially its application in computation but I thought this is for general audience. MCB, it is incomprehensible to you, probably because I didn't explain it using conventional logic, which was my intention. Sorry if I made a mistake in writing this article. Pyenos 23:37, 28 September 2005 (UTC)