Talk:Universal hashing

The two articles on universal hashing should clearly be merged. Any volunteer? Pagh 11:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see two articles on universal hashing, just this one. One might merge this universal_hashing article into the main article hash_function, but since the present article is reasonably coherent and self-contained, I don't think

that's urgent. I have removed the

tag at the beginning of this

universal_hashing article since, in its present form, the article does indeed cite the main basic references on universal hashing.CharlesHBennett (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]