Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regenerative Thought Programming – RTP

Non-notable subject, no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Essentially pure OR, no sources in the article and a plane google search gives nothing[1]. Falis WP:V and, most certainly, WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. OR Essay. Operating (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Author made the ludicrous claim on my talk page that the article is "full of sources and references" but I calls it OR. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hilarious WP:OR. VG ☎ 13:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless Lewis Harrison is found notable, in which case merge/redirect. - Eldereft (cont.) 17:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it can be merged to Lewis Harrison. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]