Jump to content

Talk:Two-level scheduling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TinucherianBot (talk | contribs) at 14:34, 26 September 2008 (Autoassessment for WP:COMP : ( FAQ ) : (Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Computing}}, class=Stub, auto=yes.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Regarding the "Linux" section: It may be that there should be a notation as to why a modern OS does not use this concept, but without that notation, simply noting the fact that a particular modern OS does not use this concept is pointless. If someone wishes to make an edit which explains why a modern OS (perhaps using generic terms) would choose not to do this, that's one thing. Simply saying "This particular OS doesnt use this" and not giving any reason.. well I could take all day to do some research and list a bunch of OSs which don't use this method, it still wouldnt be relevent to the article. This scheduling method also isn't employed by army ants, should we link to army ants as well? Vstarre 15:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]