Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System of Imagination

Delete - Fails WP:OR, WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOT.... -- Logical Premise^Ergo? 19:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not notable. There are plenty of other arguments for deletion, but that one is all that I need. Merenta (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At best it is poor original research but sadly, & per nom, it is probably little more than WP:MADEUP. Wikipedia can do without this sort of nonsense. nancy ^(talk) 19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Logical and Nancy: orignial research at best. Cliff smith ^talk 20:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, though there's something winsome about a theory of the afterdeath referenced to Wes Craven's Nightmare on Elm Street. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to look up the word winsome in wictionary. Delete. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 12:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]