User talk:216.175.112.9/archive user:216.175.112.9

vandalism

typical vandalism to my page by administrator/fascist216.175.112.9 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --fvw * 02:09, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another instance of administration abuse online. I feel like LEnny Bruce, going through the channels to point out the wrongdoings of those who attempt to 'incriminate' me.216.175.112.9

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Jonah Ayers (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to [1][2] for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

ARchive of more abusive editors

I realize it's hard to believe that everyone else is wrong and I'm right. That said, this is a case where I've become a beacon for other administrators to take out their frustration with those who take advantage or mischievously vandalize wikipedia. I've been an editor here for a little bit and since the begginning have been pegged as a sock puppet of one person or another. I still sometimes edit my original user name. But what has come about now is tantamount to fascism. I can weather this storm. I don't mind really that people write untruths about me, in fact I sort of like it, it's nice to be thought of, I'm getting under the skin of those who can't face the truth. But I archive these only so they can be together with my rebuttals. The rest is history. Read on make your own decision.216.175.112.9 04:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 04:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

The user of this IP deletes or occasionally archives his vandalism warnings. (He's already received "test4".) -- Hoary 03:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Hoary

hi Hoary thanks for coming by. I like your perserverance. Oh, the wonder of it all. Keep coming back.216.175.112.9 04:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 04:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. It's not your or anybody else's talk page, as this is merely an IP number. -- Hoary 03:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Actually I talked with you on the biff rose talk page about your help, how it was not needed. but I see you are trying to make me be someone whom I'm not.Thanks for trying!!!!216.175.112.9 05:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 05:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of questions

This is extremely urgent. I would like an explanation of this message, which you left on my talk page:

Um, Paul, maybe you should look at the current version of edits that I did, instead of trawling for something troubling. That l;abelling was indeed a mistake, and is why I therefore did not use it as the final. I reverted to the previous edit of my nemesis Sojambi Pinola. Why so antoagonistic? Wait don't answer that. PLease don't leave anymore messages for me on my talk page unless extremely urgent. I do not agree with your attitude and ways of wiki-ing. Leave me be. I'm sorry I ever asked for your assistance. It has proven to be a grave mistake. Do not repsond to my talk page for this.216.175.112.9 00:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 00:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In this message, you are taking reponsibility ("edits that I did") for changes which were made by Jonah Ayers. Are you Jonah Ayers, or are you trying to make people falsely believe that you are?

Also, your comment, "I'm sorry I ever asked for your assistance" seems to imply you have at some time asked for my assistance. I do not believe you have, but Jonah Ayers has.

Would you please explain these statements? paul klenk ^talk 05:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No no no no no no no

You are a very bad puppy, but so cute, Paulie K!!!!!

Actually, per your response on my talk page, we do not have the luxury here of ignoring other users. Please answer my question. paul klenk ^talk 05:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]