Talk:Comparison of JavaScript-based web frameworks
Appearance
![]() | Computing: Software Unassessed | ||||||||||||
|
Is there a specific reason ASP.NET Ajax is omitted, because it's not pure JavaScript for example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12:04, April 29, 2008 (talk • contribs)
- I second that. Including ASP.NET AJAX would be useful and also Adobe Spry. 66.38.203.91 (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think platform-dependent frame works are fine for this comparison, but as a whole, I'd say no. It's not a javascript framework for building apps with javascript. ASP.Net Ajax provides some client side functionality, but where it shines is clearly from server side integration. I think it would be hard pressed to hold up to some of the client side functionality provided by these complete javascript frameworks. I just don't think it's as mature yet, and I don't believe I've seen anything from microsoft to indicate that they intend to make it as complete a client side framework as these. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bensmoif (talk • contribs) 13:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can someone test the Gecco framework at http://www.spiritech.com/gecco? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.91.181.190 (talk) 14:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
What about sproutcore? www.sproutcore.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcoquet (talk • contribs) 13:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Can someone consider adding JAK (JavaScript API Kernel)David P Smith (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Can we do a clean up on these features headings / categories? They don't seem entirely relevant to frameworks designs. David P Smith (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)