Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canonical sequence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) at 18:04, 25 September 2005 (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Canonical sequence moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canonical sequence). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 18:04, 25 September 2005 by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Canonical sequence moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canonical sequence)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged somewhere - SimonP 15:32, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
This very short article is almost meaningless even for a scientist. It has already been Bot transwikied to Wiktionary; at the very least it needs a complete rewrite, but I will go for a (weak) delete. Physchim62 15:22, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with DNA sequence? —Wahoofive (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Homology (biology). Megan1967 05:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.