Jump to content

Talk:Complex conjugate of a vector space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 345Kai (talk | contribs) at 09:37, 21 September 2008 (Some ideas which came up when I read the article:). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Some ideas which came up when I read the article:

  • In some applications that I have seen, one needs to consider both a vector space V, its dual space, its complex conjugate space, and even the dual of the complex conjugate space. In this case, a notation which distinguishes the dual space from the complex conjugate space is needed. In the current article, the same notation is used for the complex conjugate space (a star sign) as is used for the dual space in its article. Suggestion: either change the notation to distinguish it from the dual space, or explain that sometimes different notations are needed.
  • I lack a good motivation for the introduction of the complex conjugate space. I am not an expert in this field myself and have no suggestion, but I guess that there are some in physics?
  • I get the feeling that the current article is a mix between basic facts, such as how a complex conjugate space is constructed, and advanced material such as functors and categories. I doubt that many who reads about complex conjugate spaces for the first time here have any idea what functors and categories are. I will try to make a separation of the two types of information.

--KYN 00:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree whole-heartedly with the first point. On overline for complex conjugation would be better for that reason.
Shambolic Entity 02:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed all the stars to overlines. Since I don't know how to make overlines on normalsize letters, all math symbols are now in larger font, hope that's OK. (The stars didn't look very good, either.) I added one sentence of motivation.--345Kai (talk) 09:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]