Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Luna Santin (talk | contribs) at 04:02, 18 September 2008 (Archiving.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/IP/A

Requests for IP check

This page lists requests to identify and block the IP addresses behind attack and vandal accounts that were previously listed at Requests for checkuser/IP check. After the account has been reported as blocked or declined by the checkusers, the report is moved here for seven days (most recent sections at the bottom), after which it is deleted. Because there is no attempt to establish a relationship with a puppetmaster account, no separate archive is kept, other than the page history.

Clerks: when clearing this page, please make note of the names of the sections you are deleting in the edit summary.




UDJ

no Declined - unnecessary and somewhat self-evident - Alison 23:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't tell what's "self-evident." Will you please elaborate? Either this account is an attempt to evade vandalism control or it's not, but which is not evident to those of us without CheckIP privilege. --Danorton (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This pretty-much covers it. It's self-evident by their behaviour that they're one and the same - Alison 00:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism at JIDF article

On two occasions, this IP has been used for offensive vandalism, once for antisemitic vandalism and once to harass Betacommand; shortly after it was blocked, this unblock request showed up from an established editor. Should I be concerned? – Luna Santin (talk) 06:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: - This IP was repeatedly used by User:Nobody of Consequence to edit, and the IP edits were done in-between his logged in edits. There's already an extensive thread about this on WP:AN here - Alison 15:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Brizhans

Second edit was to create a new AN/I thread blasting administrators for rangeblocking Brazilians. I suspect this is a sock of a banned user from that area, but am not entirely certain. -Jéské (v^_^v Bodging WP edit by edit) 18:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed - This is Wiki_brah/JeanLatore again. I already blocked the account and the underlying IP - Alison 09:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heyj00

Repeat vandalism at Montessori School of Westfield. I would like to see if an IP can be hardblocked to curtail this sockfarm. See [1] for the previous round. I've anticipated the result, and changed the soft block on 98.220.74.43 to a hard block. Kevin (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - and good call on the IPBlock - Alison 09:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Grawp

These recently active Grawp accounts were created on May 28 this year (with the time in brackets). Unless the checkuser data is too old to know what the IPs were at the time of creation, perhaps some sleeper accounts can be blocked. Spellcast (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed - thanks. Some of these were done over the last day or so - Alison 00:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iloveyouyesidoyay

Accounts were created minutes apart and Iloveyouyesidoyay created inappropriate talk pages for the others. User attempted to create an inappropriate talk page, reported himself for vandalism, reported an admin who attempted just to talk to him and a few other sillinesses. Request block of all accounts created by this user and an IP block. -Nard 04:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 IP blocked - dozens of accounts, mostly blocked as this is a serial sockpuppeteer.
TardieMcFatAss (talk · contribs) and 清扬 (talk · contribs) are actually Red X Unrelated - Alison 04:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]