Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/September 2008
Note: if the discussion that you are looking for is from this month, but is not on this page, it may still be at WP:UCFD.
September 6
Category:WikiProject Nintendo members
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 00:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now orphaned memberlist from a now-defunct WikiProject that has turned into a task force. The task force uses its separate page to keep track of its members. MuZemike (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo now redirects to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo, so it isn't actually its own WikiProject, so doesn't merit its own categroy. VegaDark (talk) 16:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete at the very least it needs a rename but I looked around and it seems that task forces don't generally have there own usercats. - Icewedge (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, under the assumption that task forces don't (commonly) get user categories. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 21:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge to Category:Nintendo Task Force members. Btw, has anyone notified the taskforce's members? Deamon138 (talk) 01:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You can ask for speedy deletion as housekeeping, since the taskforcing was already discussed. -- Ned Scott 04:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
September 5
Category:Users who are Vael Victus
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. Wizardman 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:Users who are Vael Victus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
At first glance, this would appear to be a single-page category. However, my recent communications with Vael Victus suggest that the intention is that there will be a group of Wikipedians associated with the name. Either way, this doesn't seem an appropriate use of Wikipedia. It's unclear who or what Vael Victus is and what the criteria for joining would be. I'm not sure how to address this except via Cfd-user. Stepheng3 (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a category for an un-notable internet meme; no benefit for collaboration. - Icewedge (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, since most of them probably are not Vael Victus, and anyway who is Vael Victus? — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 03:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/speedy delete per above. VegaDark (talk) 16:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think Icewedge said it best: no benefit for collaboration. Thanks, all. Stepheng3 (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.