Talk:Vegetable box scheme
Appearance
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2008. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. |
Proposal for deletion
I have tidied the article and returned it to stub status rather than have it deleted. It is no longer an advertisement, but still needs work on finding references. I think it is a valid article, but certainly not in its previous format. Poltair (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Looks a lot better. As a suggestion, is the title might be better being "Organic box scheme" or "vegetable box scheme" or something else. Whatever is most commonly found in sources. Drunken Pirate (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- The most common term of reference seems to be "Veg box" or "Vegetable box" scheme, the latter being used in written references as more formal, I suppose. I've recreated Vegetable box scheme to redirect here for now, to cover Pirate's title suggestion, but if anyone feels strongly that the title should be "Vegetable box scheme" they can always swap them over using move/redirect. I'd avoid the "Organic box scheme" title just because not all schemes are organic, according to the cited sources. Karenjc 15:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
merger with csa
i think a box scheme is somewhat different from a csa, it is just a box delivered weekly or whatever, a form of marketing, whilst csa as the name implies goes a little bit further. i also think that this article should be called vegetable box scheme..Truetom (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)