Jump to content

Category talk:Extensible syntax programming languages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 19:29, 11 September 2008 (Signing comment by 129.79.245.87 - "this seems an ill-defined category"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It seems like most modern languages are extensible to some extent; consider C and C++, with their macros, and Perl, with its source filters. What qualifies a given language for this category? Ruakh 20:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)\ Why isn't Common Lisp here? -118.90.119.117 (talk) 21:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If Lisp is here, why not Scheme, C, C++?

In what sense is OCaml extensible except via an external tool (CamlP4)? In which case, why not include Haskell/Template Haskell, MetaML/MetaOCaml. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.79.245.87 (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Extensible_syntax_programming_languages&oldid=237773996"