Jump to content

Category talk:Extensible syntax programming languages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 129.79.245.87 (talk) at 19:28, 11 September 2008 (this seems an ill-defined category). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It seems like most modern languages are extensible to some extent; consider C and C++, with their macros, and Perl, with its source filters. What qualifies a given language for this category? Ruakh 20:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)\ Why isn't Common Lisp here? -118.90.119.117 (talk) 21:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If Lisp is here, why not Scheme, C, C++?

In what sense is OCaml extensible except via an external tool (CamlP4)? In which case, why not include Haskell/Template Haskell, MetaML/MetaOCaml.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:Extensible_syntax_programming_languages&oldid=237773746"