Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci numbers and Fractals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Redvers (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 11 September 2008 (Closing debate; result was deleted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 12:57, 11 September 2008 by Redvers (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was deleted)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 12:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fibonacci numbers and Fractals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research that - if worthwhile - can be incorporated into the various articles linked to in this article. Booglamay (talk) - 10:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR as per nom. CultureDrone (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. Notability, WP:OR, and it's just not encyclopedic. QuidProQuo23 11:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR, unsourced, not notable. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. OR. Has been to AfD before with delete decisions. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. Unsourced, unnotable, OR, the text is barely coherent. Nsk92 (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.