Talk:Advanced Encryption Standard process

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advanced Encryption Standard process article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cryptography: Computer science Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

This page states that the knowledge of the crypto used for classified material is iteself classified, whereas the AES page states that AES is certified by the US Govt. for with classified information.

What's up?

--144.92.241.38 7 July 2005 21:44 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that -- it needs updating. I just removed it, because it seemed a little offtopic and, as you point out, now slightly inaccurate. The AES page goes on to say that, "This marks the first time that the public has had access to a cipher approved by NSA for TOP SECRET information." Incidentally, we also know the names of a bunch of other algorithms used for classified information, although the algorithms themselves aren't known publically — Category:Type 1 encryption algorithms. — Matt Crypto 8 July 2005 06:56 (UTC)

Broken link in the section "Rounds one and two"

http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/aes/round2/AESpressrelease-990809.pdf Jobarts^-Talk 00:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]