Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pov Pervert 5

Pov Pervert 5

Article is blatantly POV (No pun intended) and consists of weasel words; fails to mention any notability as a porno IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 01:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Heh, nice pun; on to serous matters though. Delete as per nom. RockManQ (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. That XRCO Award is a recognized award in porn and the Best of 2005 win is verifiable.[1] I will check for other coverage, but this film does a critical reception. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, if we can find sources for the XRCO Award to show that she did indeed win it that would be a pretty darn good reason to keep. RockManQ (talk) 02:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never challenged the accuracy of the XRCO win. I did not mention that because it is still not particularly notable. There are countless pornographic movies produced annually; one award, if none other were mentioned, does not make it notable. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 03:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have to recuse myself. FYI I reviewed, nominated, and voted for POV Pervert 5 in the selection process of the XRCO Awards. Out of 5000 new releases, the XRCO gave awards out to seven movies in 2005. Six if you discount best movie series being a movie. Point of comment is, many movies produced, not many get awards. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]