Talk:Tadpole Computer
Appearance
![]() | Companies Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
I concur with the unsigned request to remove this item for notability. It's also a stub, and if a spammer doesn't have the industry to be complete when spamming, well, that tells you the value of this entry. Dhvrm (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not quite as sure. Tadpole occupies a unique niche. This article, however, is little more than a stub. Ferritecore (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- http://news.com.com/2100-1005-991803.html
- http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-24412444.htm
- http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-9114394.htm
- http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-23300250.html
- http://www.businessweekly.co.uk/2008081332342/computing/shareholders-fume-at-twist-in-tadpole-tail.html
- http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/819775
- http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-19383131.html
- http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/Suns-Mobile-Workstation-Offers-SPARC-Solaris/
- http://www.mywire.com/pubs/eWeek/2003/07/21/438059?extID=10051*
- http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593-5546033-3.html
- http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/25962-1.html
- http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2004/01/20/199691/linuxworld-expo-open-source-prepares-for-the-next-offensive.htm
Tadpole is notable as evidenced by the press coverage Tadpole gets. If five seconds of searching on Google gets this many links, one has to wonder if the editor who tagged this article actually bothered to do even basic research before tagging. The article certainly needs work though, for it is too short. I am removing the tag. Rilak (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Some more links just in case:
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-143775180.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-138012366.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-152515000.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16005317.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16980757.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18902287.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-136387558.html
- http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-19917926.html
Enjoy! Rilak (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)