Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition

Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition

Original research lacking content. In my opinion lacks hope of inclusion. Please note the article in question is "Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition," not Knowledge Acquisition. BCST2001 (talk) 00:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, utterly incomprehensible. The creator should work on improving Knowledge acquisition and Knowledge Acquisition and Documentation Structuring (actually, the latter should probably be merged to the former). There are also the articles Knowledge-based systems, Knowledge base, and Knowledge Management. Knowledge based system is a redirect to Expert system, but the title with the hyphen isn't. The whole topic is a mess. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is very tempting to consider {{db-nonsense}}, since it is so hard to figure out what is the topic. If there were any sources at all, somebody could look at the sources to determine what the topic is. EdJohnston (talk) 01:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deletingly delete this meaningless conceptual concept. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: More jargon swallowing its own tail, telling nothing. Utgard Loki (talk) 13:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and see Talk:Michel_Foucault#RichardLord_edits for an explanation of another edit the user has made - they want to 'express new material' via Wikipedia, so it's original research. Esteffect (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this "newly formed conceptual (a neologism concept) concept which most certainly requires more work on its exact definition and working area." The article itself contains the rationale for deletion. --[[::User:N Shar|N Shar]] ([[::User talk:N Shar|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/N Shar|contribs]]) 22:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable neologism couched in complete bollocks. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]