This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Karenjc(talk | contribs) at 15:25, 11 August 2008(comment re improvements and title). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 15:25, 11 August 2008 by Karenjc(talk | contribs)(comment re improvements and title)
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August2008. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Proposal for deletion
I have tidied the article and returned it to stub status rather than have it deleted. It is no longer an advertisement, but still needs work on finding references. I think it is a valid article, but certainly not in its previous format. Poltair (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks a lot better. As a suggestion, is the title might be better being "Organic box scheme" or "vegetable box scheme" or something else. Whatever is most commonly found in sources. Drunken Pirate (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The most common term of reference seems to be "Veg box" or "Vegetable box" scheme, the latter being used in written references as more formal, I suppose. I've recreated Vegetable box scheme to redirect here for now, to cover Pirate's title suggestion, but if anyone feels strongly that the title should be "Vegetable box scheme" they can always swap them over using move/redirect. I'd avoid the "Organic box scheme" title just because not all schemes are organic, according to the cited sources. Karenjc15:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
