Keep this article has an edit history dating to 2003, it reads sensibly, maybe an issue with some reverts in the history, but otherwise I can see no problem with this that cannot be sorted out by collective agreement on the articles talk page. Alfmelmac11:31, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that they make wild claims about hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity that they cannot backup with evidences. I cannot see anywhere published research that says sensitivity differences would be related to dysfunctions in integration of sensory information. This seems to be a wild guess only. There is no DSM entry either for SID --Rdos14:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Google is much of an indication, especially since the individual words are quite commmon. A search on sensory+integration+dysfunction on PublMed gives 4 hits and none of them give evidences for the theory presented in the article.--Rdos14:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I was searching for the phrase, i.e. "sensory integration dysfunction". Even if it isn't in the DSM and not backed up by science it's at least a popular phrase that is much being thrown around. sensory+integration+autism gave 24 PubMed hits. Besides, for pseudoscience PubMed isn't the best source. Pilatus14:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If it is pseudoscience, according to original research it should be deleted or at least the article should describe it as such. Another problem is the links, that goes to a company seling treatments for autism. Advertising isn't allowed on WP either --213.64.2.15016:13, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensory Integration Dysfunction
