Talk:Objections to evolution/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   "The ideas gained vast popular audiences" - Unclear, referring to the objections or to the evolutionary ideas?

   The quotes of Kitcher are a bit long, perhaps some of these could be summarised?

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   Reference needed for "Although most of Darwin's contemporaries came to accept the transmutation of species based upon fossil evidence"

   b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):

   The relationship between Evolution and the Roman Catholic Church is lacking, would make a good comparison to the relationship with Protestantism in the history section.

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   More of the arguments should be attributed to specific people and sources. eg instead of "It is frequently argued that a great weakness of evolutionary theory is that it does not, or cannot, explain a certain aspect of the natural world." attribute this argument to a prominent advocate - "Creationists such as John Doe and Jean Doe argue that a great weakness of evolutionary theory is that it does not, or cannot, explain a certain aspect of the natural world."

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: