User talk:휘뚜루마뚜루
|
Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of MSX Colors
A tag has been placed on MSX Colors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with MSX Colors. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of MSX Colors
A tag has been placed on MSX Colors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
{{Boys Love-stub}} and {{MSX-stub}}
Hi - two stub templates, categories, or redirects which you created have been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub types, which were not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, do not meet the standard requirements for stub types, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type. This is not the first time that unp[roposed stub types which you have created have been listed in this way. Please, in future, PROPOSE new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Your bot request
Hi 휘뚜루마뚜루, I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WhiBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! SoxBot IX (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
슈주 팬사이트가 어떻게 백과사전이 됩니까?
"Encyclopedic" is not equivalent to encyclopedia. I know you on Korean Wikpedia, so please refrain yourself here. I would not condone any disruptive edits. 팬질은 그 팬사이트에서 하고, 여기서 멈추세요.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- 수록된 문서의 내용은 읽어 보고 쓰는 것입니까? 내용부터가 백과사전의 형식인데 백과사전이 못 된다는 것은 이해할 수 없습니다. -- MISA☆ Amane 12:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- 그렇게 따지면, 퀄리티를 보아서 슈주 팬사이트보다 훨 나아서, 수록될 "백과사전같은" 팬사이트가 너무 많네요. 아이돌 사이트를 여기다 올리면서, 홍보를 높이려는 것은 WP:Spam에 해당됩니다. 위키백과의 정책을 이해할 수 없으면, 님의 뜻이 맞는 백괴사전 같은 장소에서 편집을 하시면 되겠습니다.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
What on earth this website becoming an encycloepdia to be listed on the article. It is about how to campaign for their political agendas. 지금 장난하는 겁니까?!!!--Caspian blue (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- 백과사전으로 알고 있었는데? 아닙니까? -- MISA☆ Amane 12:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)