Talk:HTTrack

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please review my English!!!--Alex brollo 01:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article may read slightly like an advertisement, but there is nothing to be gained by the makers of HTTrack by you using the software since it's GNU licensed.

It doesn't explain what "recursively" means or what a "chron job" is. So it's a pretty obscure advert.

Bugs Section

The wording of the 'Bugs' Section is strange and looks like original research.

'It can be used for small websites only which can be downloaded all at once' - well, what does that mean? I've personally used the update feature successfully.

'HTTrack is unable to interpret the HTTP header "Content-Type" correctly'. Maybe true, but this this seems to be the design of the program, and hence not a bug.

Citations needed, please, before adding this kind of material. 222.239.174.26 (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bug regarding --continue or --update needs to be removed. Post-3.23 versions of HTTrack have the bug fixed. Tatsh (talk) 06:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]