Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Open matters/Devolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kirill Lokshin (talk | contribs) at 02:42, 12 July 2008 (Some initial points). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Preface

Some of the proposals below are extracted from several earlier documents (chiefly Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/June 2008 announcements/Appeals Review List and Wikipedia:Devolution) as well as earlier discussion by the Arbitration Committee. No attempt has been made to replicate the full rationale for those proposals here.

Proposals

Appeal review devolution

Proposal variants:

1. I
2. The Arbitration Committee shall delegate routine review of editor appeals (such as appeals of blocks or imposed sanctions) that are brought before it to one or more subsidiary appeal review committees (ARCs).

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Appeal review committees

Sanction Appeal Review Committee

Proposal variants:

1. II.1
2. A Sanction Appeal Review Committee (SARC) shall be created to review appeals of any administrative measures taken under the provisions of an Arbitration Committee ruling (including, but not limited to, article probation and discretionary sanctions).

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Block Appeal Review Committee

Proposal variants:

1. II.2
2. A Block Appeal Review Committee (BARC) shall be created to review appeals of any blocks and bans imposed by administrators.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. II.2.a
2. The BARC shall not address matters within the scope of the SARC.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Administrative Action Appeal Review Committee

Proposal variants:

1. II.3
2. An Administrative Action Appeal Review Committee (AAARC) shall be created to review appeals of all administrative actions.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. II.3.a
2. The AAAC shall not address matters within the scopes of the SARC and BARC.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Appeal committee composition

Proposal variants:

1. III.1
2. Members of all ARCs shall be appointed by the Arbitration Committee.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. III.1.a
2. Membership of an ARC shall be open to any administrator.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. III.1.b
2. Membership of an ARC shall be open to any user in good standing.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. III.1.c
2. Members of an ARC may be removed by the Arbitration Committee.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Appeal committee procedures

Submissions

Proposal variants:

1. IV.1
2. Any editor subject to an administrative action for which there exists an applicable ARC may appeal to that ARC for review of the action.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.1.a
2. Editors who believe that the applicable ARC will be unable to properly consider their appeal may request that the Arbitration Committee review it directly.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.1.b
2. Sanctions imposed directly by the Arbitration Committee as part of an arbitration case shall not be subject to appeal to an ARC.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.1.c
2. All appeals to an ARC shall be public.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Deliberations

Proposal variants:

1. IV.2
2. ARCs shall conduct all deliberations publicly.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.2.a
2. ARCs shall produce a final decision by rough consensus.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.2.b
2. ARCs shall produce a final decision by majority vote.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments

Decisions

Proposal variants:

1. IV.3
2. When deliberations are complete, an ARC shall confirm, modify, or reverse the administrative action which was appealed.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.3.a
2. An ARC shall take the appropriate action directly. Further appeals may be made to the Arbitration Committee directly.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.3.b
2. An ARC shall make a recommendation to the Arbitration Committee, which may choose to accept the proposed action or to hear the appeal directly, at its discretion.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments
Proposal variants:

1. IV.3.c
2. If an ARC is unable to come to a decision, for whatever reason, it shall make a statement to that effect to the Arbitration Committee.

Arbitrator comments
Other comments