Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five point scale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keeper76 (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 7 July 2008 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:25, 7 July 2008 by Keeper76 (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Five point scale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is not supported by reliable sources, and attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed. I have checked Pubmed and Google Scholar. The topic, whatever it is, is certainly not notable within the context of High functioning autism, which is what the article's text currently claims. Eubulides (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable, no reliable sources, not even worth a merge. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have actually heard of this before, in an excerpt from a book which appeared in Uta Frith's book Autism and Asperger Syndrome. But that doesn't mean it's used regularly, and even if it is, calling it *the* five point scale as if there are no others and dedicating the article to it is a little bit silly and so that is why I am voting Delete. Soap Talk/Contributions 21:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My search suggests it is a book or DVD. That's it. Artene50 (talk) 04:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced, but defer to any opinion by Eubulides (talk · contribs). JFW | T@lk 07:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable in this context, and a misuse of a the term (compared to a Likert scaled for example). Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.