Jump to content

Talk:Structure tensor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jiuguang Wang (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 7 July 2008 ({{WikiProject Robotics|nested=no|class=|importance=}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconRobotics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

paper?

  • This article seems to be writen like an academic paper, and is therefore, not very encyclopedic. The original author or some other party should attempt to modify the article to make it read more like an encyclopedic text. CB Droege 19:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The purpose of the page is both as an introduction and tutorial on structure tensors. I appreciate the feedback, nevertheless, this was not a published academic paper and the subject matter is geared especially to those needing help with structure tensors for computer vision in a reference, i.e. encyclopedic, fashion. I am open to specific suggestions as to how to make it "...read more like an encyclopedic text" other than adding a history section. Thanks again for the feedback. S. Arseneau, 22 September 2006
    • This then is the problem with the article. It is a well done article, but Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic articles, not tutorials or instructions. The article needs some work before it is apropriate for this context. CB Droege 14:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not fully wikified but (arguably) looking better and good enough until edited? Rich257 20:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]