Talk:Minkowski's question-mark function
Appearance
Just a comment, this has to be the worst example of bad choice of notation...what was he thinking?? Revolver 07:06, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
- Dates back to the dawn of the discovery of pathological functions, at the turn of the 20th century. Maybe it was felt to be very confusing? And maybe he had a twisted sense of humour. linas 00:36, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- Why is ? any crazier than ! (asks one who shorthands sin and cos with $ and ¢)? Kwantus 2005 June 29 17:52 (UTC)
- Worse yet, it conflicts with a much more useful notation, d?k for the binomial coefficient d!/(d−k)!k!, generalizing to ?⟨i0,…,in⟩ for the multinomial coefficient of a multi-index. Without regard for degree we can write
- as the general term of a multinomial expansion, where the multi-index exponent, as usual, means
- ,
- and