Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumerization

Weak Delete or rewrite/expand so that the article contains more than just a dictionary like definition since Wikipedia is not a dictionary. GO-PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 19:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can see that this has potential. I'd rather see it expanded than deleted.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I fully agree that the initial frame is weak, and needs expansion. I focussed effort on researching the appropriate references as the last time I started a wiki article it was deleted due to the fact that it had no references before I had time to complete it or insert references. Looks like I did it the wrong way round. I have also invited a number of the subject area exeprts namely Douglas Neal and ithers to expand the article. I am confident that the article can and will expand to something that will do the Wikipedia proud. User:Adrius42 —Preceding comment was added at 20:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article's not great as is, but I'm with Paulmcdonald in seeing the potential. Vickser (talk) 01:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]