Jump to content

Talk:Hierarchical visitor pattern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TinucherianBot (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 25 June 2008 (WP:COMPUTING Tagging ! (False Positive ) ?? :(Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Computing}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am ignorant of software development, but I have this comment on grammar: I would guess that "hierarchical visitor pattern" means either

  • A visitor pattern that is hierarchical

or

  • A pattern that involves a "hierarchical visitor".

I don't know which it is. But if the latter, then there should be a hyphen, thus: "hierarchical-visitor pattern". If the former, then there should be no hyphen. -- Mike Hardy

See the definition in the article about my understanding. I think the grammar is incorrect. But I think it happens frequently in computer science, so it may be okay. -- Taku 22:14 Jan 3, 2003 (UTC)


As I understand it, a "normal" visitor pattern is already hierarchical and works on structures like trees. So what is special about hierarchical visitor patterns?

--zeno 11:36, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)

The article originally contained a load of material copied from somewhere else. That has been removed, and now the article is vacuous. Leibniz 19:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. How do we propose this page for deletion, then? (Somebody who knows wikipedia better than me, please help.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.170.62 (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]