Jump to content

Talk:Outline of human–computer interaction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TinucherianBot (talk | contribs) at 06:08, 25 June 2008 (WP:COMP Tagging ! (False Postive ?? ) :(Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Computing}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why a separate article?

Why is this a separate article. While its categorization is useful, Wikipedia has support for proper categorization (see Wikipedia:Category) and I do not understand why we need this second (less integrated) method? Aspects of this article that can not be turned into wikipedia categories should be merged into the main Human-computer interaction article in my opinion. --Ben Houston 04:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say leave this article as is for now. Most, if not all of it, should be turned into sections with commentary in human-computer interaction, which may take a while to happen, but for now it serves as a useful high-level map of the mess of stuff on wikipedia related to HCI. If it gets turned into "proper" categorizations, this could be quite messy (it's not clear at all what the correct categories should be) and make it difficult for authors/editors to see a high-level picture since only 1 level will be visible at a time in the hierarchy. MichaelMcGuffin 16:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

another person?

Should Ben Shneiderman be added to the people list? He seems to be a significant author/researcher in the field. Notably coining [[Direct_m

anipilation]]. -- Stephen De Gabrielle 16:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]