Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

EXTREMELY BAD

I remember reading this article a while back as a good article. I came back to it to find it: a) subjective or opinionated b) written like a magazine article or review c) written in an informal manner d) written so that it did not look like the other articles I finished fixing these problems. I AM KEEPING AN EYE ON THIS ONE! - PGSONIC 13:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link

I found the 'home page' link was broken, but a quick Google search found an on-line version, so I replaced the broken link with the new link.

Looking at it, though, I'm not sure it's the same book. It's dated 2001, for a start, there is Perl but no 'hoc' and no mention of Kernighan and Pike, or Prentice-Hall.

Feel free to delete the link, but there seems no point in reverting to the previous one. I'll amend the article to emphasize that the 'on-line' version just shares the same title. Pavium (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original link is not broken, it's just that bell labs server going down once in a while. It's up at the moment of writing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.122.181.93 (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]