Talk:C++Builder
![]() | Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Adding a See also section
I was looking this page a few months ago because I wanted a similar application but free software. I do not know how to add to this page:
See Also WxDev-C++
It can be useful for some people looking for a free integrated development environment similar to C++ builder. unsigned comment 05:51, 14 November 2006 130.206.92.100
- I added the See also section. (See: WP:LAYOUT#See also; it's "See also" rather than "See Also".) --Teratornis 20:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Software
I added an {{Infobox Software}} template to C++Builder. I could not determine the values for these fields in the template:
latest_release_version = | latest_release_date = |
I am asking anyone with knowledge of this product to complete those fields. Thanks. --Teratornis 21:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Spelling
According to all of the official images and literature from the product developer (Borland and now CodeGear), the name of the product is C++Builder, with no space between "C++" and "Builder". I see that most references to the product name in this article insert the space. Is there a reason for this or is this a typing mistake? Notbyworks 21:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
C# Builder not popular RAD tool?
This article states:
"Other popular visual RAD tools include Delphi, JBuilder and C# Builder from Borland, and Visual Basic from Microsoft."
While the article on CSharpBuilder states this tool is not popular and is not supported:
"C#Builder's functionality has since been incorporated into Borland's Delphi and C#Builder is no longer developed as a separate application."
Which is true? --Stardancer 06:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)