Wikipedia:Editor review/Leonard^Bloom
Leonard^Bloom (talk · contribs) Although pretty new to Wikipedia and having a relatively low edit count, I would love to get some feedback on my current work. I know I need to use more edit summaries, but feel free to harp on me for that; I could certainly use the repetition and reminder. Leonard^Bloom (talk) 02:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
- Taking a focus on article-writing (and the subject you enjoy covering!) would help broaden your experience on Wikipedia and make it more rewarding. New stubs can become Did You Know candidates, and if you're game enough, go for a featured article. Keep up on your vandal-patrolling, though! - Mailer Diablo 15:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Read up on WP:CSD and WP:N more, and get a better idea of what is considered encyclopedic. I've only seen a bit of your speedy work, but it's not very good. Wizardman 02:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- You've done an excellent job with your huggle reverts. Keep it up!--Xp54321 (Hello! • Contribs) 22:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I'm pretty pleased with my anti-vandal work, and my work on the cancer dictionary, and although most articles I made for the dictionary were stubs, I like to think to tell myself that it's better than nothing (denial :D ). The anti-vandal work is pretty solid though.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I haven't been in any conflicts, though I see them all the time. Honestly, I've done very little communication on talk pages and such. As for how I would deal them, it would probably be an effort to maintain a civil disposition and a sense of empathy.