Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Example/Status

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SJP (talk | contribs) at 20:53, 15 June 2008 (User:Example/Status: I don't see any reasons to delete this). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I'm not sure what it's purpose is; User:Example is not a real person - it is only an account to be used as an example. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 21:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. It serves as an example status template. This MfD caused User talk:Tm93 to be on the category for MfD pages. I will now have to remove that from the user's page. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 21:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep page is used for Wikipedia:Editor activity indicator. -Nard 21:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Problem. N just removed the mfd template from the status template. However, it says specificly not to do so. N also removed it using rollback. So is the discussion over? Should we close it as keep? Or should we re-add the mfd template? We need to decide on one or the other, or an alternate solution. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 22:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I removed it to prevent transclusion problems. The warning not to remove it is there so people can see it on highly trafficked pages. If nobody complains it doesn't really matter if it's removed. I doubt this page gets little if any hits so I very much doubt it actually matters in this case. Put it back if you want, but please wrap it in noinclude tags. -Nard 03:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep currently used example page. -- Ned Scott 05:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Since it currently has a purpose on wikipedia I think it should be kept. Also, I haven't seen any convincing arguments on why it should be deleted, so that seals the deal.--SJP (talk) 20:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]